Head-to-head (H2H)
Covers the last 10 head-to-head meetings between these teams at most, the colored bar shows the split of wins, draws, and losses.
10 meetings — from the perspective of Chicago Fire
Streaks - Chicago Fire
Percentage of recent matches in which the given condition was met — calculated separately for home and away appearances.
- Chicago Fire — both teams score (BTTS) at home (10/10, 100%)
- Chicago Fire — over 1.5 goals in the match at home (10/10, 100%)
- Chicago Fire — over 0.5 goals in the 1st half at home (10/10, 100%)
- Chicago Fire — over 0.5 goals in the 2nd half at home (10/10, 100%)
- Chicago Fire — over 2.5 goals in the match at home (9/10, 90%)
Streaks - Columbus Crew
Percentage of recent matches in which the given condition was met — calculated separately for home and away appearances.
- Columbus Crew — over 1.5 goals in the match away (10/10, 100%)
- Columbus Crew — over 0.5 goals in the 2nd half away (10/10, 100%)
- Columbus Crew — over 0.5 goals in the 1st half away (9/10, 90%)
- Columbus Crew — is unbeaten in the 2nd half away (8/10, 80%)
- Columbus Crew — both teams score (BTTS) away (7/10, 70%)
Series - Chicago Fire
Unlike Streaks, this isn't a proportion of recent matches — it's the longest currently active, unbroken run of meeting the given condition.
- 🔥 Chicago Fire — is unbeaten in 3 matches in a row
- 🔥 Chicago Fire — both teams score (BTTS) in 3 matches in a row
- 🔥 Chicago Fire — over 1.5 goals in the match in 3 matches in a row
- 🔥 Chicago Fire — over 2.5 goals in the match in 3 matches in a row
- 🔥 Chicago Fire — over 0.5 goals in the 1st half in 7 matches in a row
Series - Columbus Crew
Unlike Streaks, this isn't a proportion of recent matches — it's the longest currently active, unbroken run of meeting the given condition.
- 🔥 Columbus Crew — wins in 3 matches in a row
- 🔥 Columbus Crew — is unbeaten in 6 matches in a row
- 🔥 Columbus Crew — over 1.5 goals in the match in 3 matches in a row
- 🔥 Columbus Crew — wins the 1st half in 3 matches in a row
- 🔥 Columbus Crew — is unbeaten in the 1st half in 6 matches in a row
Head-to-head history (H2H)
Pick a condition from the list (result, goals, BTTS, corners, cards) to see which of these head-to-head meetings met it.
Detailed stats
Percentages (Win/BTTS/clean sheet) and per-match averages — goals, possession, shots, fouls — not season totals.
| Chicago Fire | Home | Away | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|
Win % | 50% | 40% | 45% |
Avg. goals/match | 3.30 | 3.70 | 3.50 |
Scored | 1.70 | 1.80 | 1.75 |
Conceded | 1.60 | 1.90 | 1.75 |
BTTS % | 100% | 70% | 85% |
Clean sheet % | 0% | 10% | 5% |
Failed to score % | 0% | 20% | 10% |
Ball possession | 51% | 53% | 52% |
Avg. shots/match | 15.10 | 13.78 | 14.47 |
Avg. fouls/match | 12.40 | 12.33 | 12.37 |
| Columbus Crew | Home | Away | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|
Win % | 60% | 30% | 45% |
Avg. goals/match | 3.00 | 3.40 | 3.20 |
Scored | 1.90 | 1.70 | 1.80 |
Conceded | 1.10 | 1.70 | 1.40 |
BTTS % | 60% | 70% | 65% |
Clean sheet % | 30% | 30% | 30% |
Failed to score % | 20% | 0% | 10% |
Ball possession | 54% | 58% | 56% |
Avg. shots/match | 13.88 | 13.88 | 13.88 |
Avg. fouls/match | 11.13 | 10.75 | 10.94 |
Last 10 matches
- 01/11/2026Wvs Colorado Rapids4-2
- 29/10/2026Dvs Orlando City SC2-2
- 24/10/2026Wvs Atlanta United FC3-2
- 17/10/2026Lvs New England Revolution0-1
- 15/10/2026Lvs Philadelphia Union1-3
- 10/10/2026Wvs New York City FC2-1
- 07/10/2026Wvs Vancouver Whitecaps3-1
- 26/09/2026Wvs Charlotte1-0
- 20/09/2026Lvs Nashville SC0-3
- 13/09/2026Lvs New England Revolution1-2
- 31/10/2026Wvs DC United3-0
- 29/10/2026Wvs FC Dallas2-0
- 24/10/2026Wvs Toronto FC4-2
- 22/10/2026Dvs St. Louis City0-0
- 18/10/2026Wvs FC Cincinnati2-0
- 14/10/2026Wvs Charlotte3-1
- 10/10/2026Lvs Orlando City SC2-3
- 27/09/2026Wvs Inter Miami2-1
- 19/09/2026Wvs CF Montreal2-0
- 16/09/2026Wvs Orlando City SC2-1
Goal thresholds
| Chicago Fire | Columbus Crew | |
|---|---|---|
Over 0.5 | 100% (10/10) | 100% (10/10) |
Over 1.5 | 100% (10/10) | 100% (10/10) |
Over 2.5 | 90% (9/10) | 60% (6/10) |
Over 3.5 | 40% (4/10) | 50% (5/10) |
Failed to score | 0% (0/10) | 0% (0/10) |
1st half — 1-2 goals | 85% (17/20) | 60% (12/20) |
1st half — 1-3 goals | 90% (18/20) | 85% (17/20) |
2nd half — 1-2 goals | 60% (12/20) | 85% (17/20) |
2nd half — 1-3 goals | 80% (16/20) | 85% (17/20) |
| Chicago Fire | Columbus Crew | |
|---|---|---|
Over 0.5 | 100% (10/10) | 90% (9/10) |
Over 1.5 | 40% (4/10) | 50% (5/10) |
Over 2.5 | 0% (0/10) | 40% (4/10) |
Over 3.5 | 0% (0/10) | 0% (0/10) |
Failed to score | 40% (4/10) | 30% (3/10) |
1st half — 1-2 goals | 85% (17/20) | 60% (12/20) |
1st half — 1-3 goals | 90% (18/20) | 85% (17/20) |
2nd half — 1-2 goals | 60% (12/20) | 85% (17/20) |
2nd half — 1-3 goals | 80% (16/20) | 85% (17/20) |
| Chicago Fire | Columbus Crew | |
|---|---|---|
Over 0.5 | 100% (10/10) | 100% (10/10) |
Over 1.5 | 60% (6/10) | 40% (4/10) |
Over 2.5 | 30% (3/10) | 10% (1/10) |
Over 3.5 | 0% (0/10) | 10% (1/10) |
Failed to score | 30% (3/10) | 20% (2/10) |
1st half — 1-2 goals | 85% (17/20) | 60% (12/20) |
1st half — 1-3 goals | 90% (18/20) | 85% (17/20) |
2nd half — 1-2 goals | 60% (12/20) | 85% (17/20) |
2nd half — 1-3 goals | 80% (16/20) | 85% (17/20) |
Corner stats
Thresholds are calculated as the sum of both teams' corners in the match, not just one side's.
| Overall | Chicago Fire | Columbus Crew | |
|---|---|---|---|
Match Corners AVG | 8.86 (35/40) | 8.84 (19/20) | 8.88 (16/20) |
Over 6.5 Corners | 80% (28/35) | 84% (16/19) | 75% (12/16) |
Over 7.5 Corners | 69% (24/35) | 68% (13/19) | 69% (11/16) |
Over 8.5 Corners | 57% (20/35) | 63% (12/19) | 50% (8/16) |
Over 9.5 Corners | 43% (15/35) | 42% (8/19) | 44% (7/16) |
Over 10.5 Corners | 26% (9/35) | 26% (5/19) | 25% (4/16) |
Over 11.5 Corners | 17% (6/35) | 11% (2/19) | 25% (4/16) |
Over 12.5 Corners | 14% (5/35) | 11% (2/19) | 19% (3/16) |
Over 13.5 Corners | 9% (3/35) | 5% (1/19) | 13% (2/16) |
Over 14.5 Corners | 0% (0/35) | 0% (0/19) | 0% (0/16) |
Team corners
Corners won by this team and corners conceded to the opponent — two separate sets under the Earned/Conceded tabs.
| Overall | Chicago Fire | Columbus Crew | |
|---|---|---|---|
Corners Earned Match | 5.08 | 4.80 | 5.35 |
More Corners Than Opponent | 50% (20/40) | 50% (10/20) | 50% (10/20) |
Over 2.5 Corners Earned | 75% (30/40) | 70% (14/20) | 80% (16/20) |
Over 3.5 Corners Earned | 60% (24/40) | 55% (11/20) | 65% (13/20) |
Over 4.5 Corners Earned | 48% (19/40) | 45% (9/20) | 50% (10/20) |
Over 5.5 Corners Earned | 38% (15/40) | 40% (8/20) | 35% (7/20) |
Over 6.5 Corners Earned | 30% (12/40) | 25% (5/20) | 35% (7/20) |
Over 7.5 Corners Earned | 23% (9/40) | 20% (4/20) | 25% (5/20) |
Over 8.5 Corners Earned | 15% (6/40) | 10% (2/20) | 20% (4/20) |
Corners Earned | 203 | 96 | 107 |
| Overall | Chicago Fire | Columbus Crew | |
|---|---|---|---|
Corners Against Match | 3.80 | 4.20 | 3.40 |
More Corners Than Opponent | 50% (20/40) | 50% (10/20) | 50% (10/20) |
Over 2.5 Corners Against | 80% (32/40) | 85% (17/20) | 75% (15/20) |
Over 3.5 Corners Against | 55% (22/40) | 70% (14/20) | 40% (8/20) |
Over 4.5 Corners Against | 33% (13/40) | 40% (8/20) | 25% (5/20) |
Over 5.5 Corners Against | 15% (6/40) | 25% (5/20) | 5% (1/20) |
Over 6.5 Corners Against | 10% (4/40) | 15% (3/20) | 5% (1/20) |
Over 7.5 Corners Against | 8% (3/40) | 10% (2/20) | 5% (1/20) |
Over 8.5 Corners Against | 3% (1/40) | 0% (0/20) | 5% (1/20) |
Corners Against | 152 | 84 | 68 |
Match cards
The sum of yellow and red cards (each counted as 1) shown in the match to both teams.
| Overall | Chicago Fire | Columbus Crew | |
|---|---|---|---|
Match Cards AVG | 4.13 (40/40) | 4.20 (20/20) | 4.05 (20/20) |
Over 0.5 Cards | 100% (40/40) | 100% (20/20) | 100% (20/20) |
Over 1.5 Cards | 95% (38/40) | 95% (19/20) | 95% (19/20) |
Over 2.5 Cards | 78% (31/40) | 80% (16/20) | 75% (15/20) |
Over 3.5 Cards | 63% (25/40) | 65% (13/20) | 60% (12/20) |
Over 4.5 Cards | 33% (13/40) | 30% (6/20) | 35% (7/20) |
Over 5.5 Cards | 20% (8/40) | 25% (5/20) | 15% (3/20) |
Over 6.5 Cards | 10% (4/40) | 15% (3/20) | 5% (1/20) |
Over 7.5 Cards | 8% (3/40) | 10% (2/20) | 5% (1/20) |
Total Cards | 165 | 84 | 81 |
Highest in a Match | 11 | 8 | 11 |
Lowest in a Match | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Team shots
Total shots, shots on target, and conversion rate — the share of shots converted into goals. Chicago Fire is 13% better than Columbus Crew in terms of shots per match.
| Overall | Chicago Fire | Columbus Crew | |
|---|---|---|---|
Shots / match | 13.81 | 14.63 | 12.97 |
Shots on target / match | 4.94 | 5.19 | 4.68 |
Shots off target / match | 5.06 | 5.00 | 5.13 |
Shot conversion rate | 12.8% | 12.8% | 12.7% |
Shots per goal | 7.84 | 7.80 | 7.88 |
Shots on target per goal | 2.80 | 2.77 | 2.84 |
Shots Over 10.5 | 68% (43/63) | 72% (23/32) | 65% (20/31) |
Shots Over 11.5 | 60% (38/63) | 66% (21/32) | 55% (17/31) |
Shots Over 12.5 | 56% (35/63) | 63% (20/32) | 48% (15/31) |
Shots Over 13.5 | 49% (31/63) | 63% (20/32) | 35% (11/31) |
Shots Over 14.5 | 40% (25/63) | 53% (17/32) | 26% (8/31) |
Shots on target Over 3.5 | 75% (47/63) | 75% (24/32) | 74% (23/31) |
Shots on target Over 4.5 | 41% (26/63) | 50% (16/32) | 32% (10/31) |
Shots on target Over 5.5 | 33% (21/63) | 41% (13/32) | 26% (8/31) |
Shots on target Over 6.5 | 17% (11/63) | 22% (7/32) | 13% (4/31) |
Offside Stats
Match rows count both teams' offsides combined, Team rows count only this team's (not the opponent's), as a per-match average. Chicago Fire posts a 7% higher offsides per match than Columbus Crew.
| Overall | Chicago Fire | Columbus Crew | |
|---|---|---|---|
Match Offsides AVG | 4.27 | 4.38 | 4.17 |
Match Offsides Over 0.5 % | 100% (59/59) | 100% (29/29) | 100% (30/30) |
Match Offsides Over 1.5 % | 92% (54/59) | 86% (25/29) | 97% (29/30) |
Match Offsides Over 2.5 % | 81% (48/59) | 76% (22/29) | 87% (26/30) |
Match Offsides Over 3.5 % | 63% (37/59) | 69% (20/29) | 57% (17/30) |
Team Offsides AVG | 2.07 | 2.14 | 2.00 |
Team Offsides Over 0.5 % | 83% (49/59) | 83% (24/29) | 83% (25/30) |
Team Offsides Over 1.5 % | 58% (34/59) | 66% (19/29) | 50% (15/30) |
Team Offsides Over 2.5 % | 34% (20/59) | 38% (11/29) | 30% (9/30) |
Expected Goals
xG is the expected number of goals calculated from the quality of scoring chances, not the actual match result. Chicago Fire is 30% better than Columbus Crew in terms of expected goals (xG).
| Overall | Chicago Fire | Columbus Crew | |
|---|---|---|---|
xG (For) | 1.55 | 1.76 | 1.35 |
xGA (Against) | 1.28 | 1.30 | 1.27 |
Under thresholds (full match)
The inverse of Over thresholds — shows matches with a goal count below the given threshold, not above.
| Overall | Chicago Fire | Columbus Crew | |
|---|---|---|---|
Under 0.5 | 3% (1/40) | 0% (0/20) | 5% (1/20) |
Under 1.5 | 10% (4/40) | 10% (2/20) | 10% (2/20) |
Under 2.5 | 25% (10/40) | 20% (4/20) | 30% (6/20) |
Under 3.5 | 58% (23/40) | 55% (11/20) | 60% (12/20) |
Under 4.5 | 83% (33/40) | 85% (17/20) | 80% (16/20) |
Under 5.5 | 93% (37/40) | 90% (18/20) | 95% (19/20) |